IMF board to resume debate over Georgieva’s future later Monday

, IMF board to resume debate over Georgieva’s future later Monday, The Evepost National News

Article content

WASHINGTON — The International Monetary Fund’s 24-member executive board is due to resume talks later on Monday about data-rigging allegations against Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, after vowing on Sunday to resolve the issue “very soon,” sources familiar with the matter said.

France and other European governments on Friday backed the Bulgarian economist to complete her term as IMF chief, while U.S. officials and others had sought more time to study the differing accounts about data irregularities in the World Bank’s now-canceled “Doing Business” report.

Advertisement

Story continues below

Article content

Georgieva has strongly denied https://www.skdknick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021.10.06-Statement-of-Kristalina-Georgieva-to-IMF-Executive-Board.pdf the allegations, which date back to 2017, when she was the World Bank’s chief executive. She became the IMF’s managing director in October, 2019.

An investigation report https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/84a922cc9273b7b120d49ad3b9e9d3f9-0090012021/original/DB-Investigation-Findings-and-Report-to-the-Board-of-Executive-Directors-September-15-2021.pdf prepared for the World Bank board by the law firm WilmerHale alleged that Georgieva and other senior officials applied “undue pressure” on bank staff to alter data to boost China’s ranking in the “Doing Business” report, just as the bank was seeking Beijing’s support for a major capital increase.

Advertisement

Story continues below

Article content

The scandal threatens to overshadow this week’s high-profile fall meetings of the IMF and World Bank, where Georgieva is due to take a lead role along with World Bank President David Malpass in discussions on the global recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, debt relief and efforts to speed vaccinations.

MIXED VIEWS

France and other European governments had pressed for a speedy resolution ahead of the meetings and have urged other shareholders to back Georgieva, according to sources familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The United States and Japan, the fund’s two largest shareholders, meanwhile, pushed for a more thorough review and cautioned against prematurely reconfirming confidence in the IMF leader, said one of the sources.

Advertisement

Story continues below

Article content

The board generally acts by consensus, but could take a vote if the differences among the shareholders cannot be resolved, the source said.

, IMF board to resume debate over Georgieva’s future later Monday, The Evepost National News

A second source expressed confidence that Georgieva ultimately would be cleared, given the strong support she has received from shareholders in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, but said it remained unclear if U.S. concerns had been satisfied.

Monday’s meeting, initially slated to begin at 10 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT) was postponed for hours as board members consulted with their governments after another marathon meeting that ended late Sunday night.

Malpass on Monday declined to comment on the IMF process, but said the World Bank was working to improve the integrity of its research, including by elevating its chief economist, Carmen Reinhart, to be part of the bank’s 10-person senior-management team.

Advertisement

Story continues below

Article content

“We’ve taken several steps … to build morale,” Malpass said. “I met last week with the economics staff and with Carmen and her large economic staff, and recommitted myself and the bank to the development agenda that is the mission of the bank.”

Mo Ibrahim, a Sudanese-British billionaire who leads a foundation focused on leadership in Africa, on Sunday called Georgieva a “highly competent leader” https://mo.ibrahim.foundation/news/2021/us-china-and-kristalina and said it would be a shame if she “falls victim to spurious charges of favoring China.”

He said the charges leveled at Georgieva were part of a geopolitical battle between the United States and China that posed “an existential threat to multilateralism and global institutions.” (Reporting by Andrea Shalal Additional reporting by David Lawder Editing by Paul Simao)

Advertisement

Story continues below

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.